Identification

Description


Numéro UN : UN1624

Formule moléculaire brute : Cl2Hg

Principaux synonymes

Noms français :

  • CHLORURE DE MERCURE(II)
  • Chlorure mercurique
  • DICHLORURE DE MERCURE
  • Dichlorure de mercure(II)
  • Mercuric chloride
  • Mercury(II) chloride

Noms anglais :

  • Mercuric chloride
  • MERCURIC CHLORIDE POWDER
  • Mercury(II) chloride
Utilisation et sources d'émission

Agent de placage, catalyseur

Références

  • ▲1.  Cairelli, S.G., Ludwig, H.R. et Whalen, J.J., Documentation for immediately dangerous to life or health concentrations (IDLHS). Springfield (VA) : NTIS. (1994). PB-94-195047. [RM-515102]   http://www.cdc.gov/niosh/idlh/intridl4.html
  • ▲2.  Drolet, D. et Beauchamp, G, Guide d'échantillonnage des contaminants de l'air en milieu de travail. Études et recherches / Guide technique, 8ème éd. revue et mise à jour. Montréal : IRSST. (2012). T-06. [MO-220007]   http://www.irsst.qc.ca
    http://www.irsst.qc.ca/files/documents/PubIRSST/t-06.pdf
  • ▲3.  Truchon, G., Guide de surveillance biologique : prélèvement et interprétation des résultats. Études et recherches / IRSST, 5ème éd. Montréal : IRSST. (1999). T-03.   http://www.irsst.qc.ca http://www.irsst.qc.ca/media/documents/pubirsst/t-03.pdf
  • ▲4.  Règlement sur la santé et la sécurité du travail [S-2.1, r. 13]. Québec : Éditeur officiel du Québec. [RJ-510071]   http://legisquebec.gouv.qc.ca/fr/ShowDoc/cr/S-2.1,%20r.%2013
  • ▲5.  Grant, W.M. et Schuman, J.S., Toxicology of the eye : effects on the eyes and visual systems from chemicals, drugs, metals and minerals, plants, toxins and venoms; also, systemic side effects from eye medications. Vol. 2, 4éme éd. Springfield, ILL : Charles C. Thomas. (1993). [RM-515030]
  • ▲5.  Grant, W.M. et Schuman, J.S., Toxicology of the eye : effects on the eyes and visual systems from chemicals, drugs, metals and minerals, plants, toxins and venoms; also, systemic side effects from eye medications. Vol. 2, 4éme éd. Springfield, ILL : Charles C. Thomas. (1993). [RM-515030]
  • ▲6.  Kligman, A.M., «The identification of contact allergens by human assay. III. The maximization test : a procedure for screening and rating contact sensitizers.» Journal of Investigative Dermatology. Vol. 47, no. 5, p. 393-409. (1966). [AP-022756]
  • ▲7.  Basketter, D.A., Scholes, E.W. et Kimber, I., «The performance of the local lymph node assay with chemicals identified as contact allergens in the human maximization test.» Food and Chemical Toxicology. Vol. 32, no. 6, p. 543-547. (1994).
  • ▲8.  Kligman, A.M. et Magnusson, B., «The identification of contact allergens by animal assay : the guinea pig maximization test.» Journal of investigative dermatology. Vol. 52, no. 3, p. 268-276. (1969).   http://www.nature.com/jid/journal/v52/n3/pdf/jid196942a.pdf
  • ▲9.  Rudzki, E., Rebandel, P. et Grzyma, Z., «Patch tests with occupational contactants in nurses, doctors and dentists.» Contact Dermatitis. Vol. 20, p. 247-250. (1989). [AP-026192]
  • ▲9.  Rudzki, E., Rebandel, P. et Grzyma, Z., «Patch tests with occupational contactants in nurses, doctors and dentists.» Contact Dermatitis. Vol. 20, p. 247-250. (1989). [AP-026192]
  • ▲10.  Basketter, D.A. et al., «The local lymph node assay : a viable alternative to currently accepted skin sensitization tests.» Food and Chemical Toxicology. Vol. 34, p. 985-997. (1996). [AP-050952]
  • ▲11.  Baer, R.L., Ramsey, D.L. et Biondi, E., «The most common contact allergens.» Archives of Dermatology. Vol. 108, p. 74-78. (1973). [AP-022042]
  • ▲12.  Nordlind, K. et Liden, S., «Patch test reactions to metal salts in patients with oral mucosal lesions associated with amalgam restorations.» Contact Dermatitis. Vol. 27, p. 157-160. (1992). [AP-039684]
  • ▲12.  Nordlind, K. et Liden, S., «Patch test reactions to metal salts in patients with oral mucosal lesions associated with amalgam restorations.» Contact Dermatitis. Vol. 27, p. 157-160. (1992). [AP-039684]
  • ▲13.  Miller, E.G., Perry, W.L. et Wagner, M.J., «Prevalence of mercury hypersensitivity in dental students.» The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. Vol. 58, no. 2, p. 235-237. (1987). [AP-024305]
  • ▲14.  Pambor, M. et Timmel, A., «Mercury dermatitis.» Contact Dermatitis. Vol. 20, p. 157. (1989).
  • ▲15.  IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans, Beryllium, cadmium, mercury, and exposures in the glass manufacturing industry. IARC monographs on the evaluation of carcinogenic risks to humans, Vol. 58. Lyon : International Agency for Research on Cancer. (1993).   https://monographs.iarc.fr/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/mono58.pdf
    http://www.iarc.fr
  • ▲16.  National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, RTECS (Registry of Toxic Effects of Chemical Substances). Hamilton (Ont) : Canadian Centre for Occupational Health and Safety.   http://ccinfoweb.ccohs.ca/rtecs/search.html
  • ▲16.  National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, RTECS (Registry of Toxic Effects of Chemical Substances). Hamilton (Ont) : Canadian Centre for Occupational Health and Safety.   http://ccinfoweb.ccohs.ca/rtecs/search.html
  • ▲17.  Joint WHO/FAO Expert Committee on Food Additives (JECFA ), «Safety evaluation of certain contaminants in food. .» In: WHO food additives series: 63. FAO JECFA monographs 8. , p. 1-799. Genève : World Health Organization ; International Programme on Chemical Safety. (2011).   http://www.inchem.org/documents/jecfa/jecmono/v63je01.pdf
  • ▲17.  Joint WHO/FAO Expert Committee on Food Additives (JECFA ), «Safety evaluation of certain contaminants in food. .» In: WHO food additives series: 63. FAO JECFA monographs 8. , p. 1-799. Genève : World Health Organization ; International Programme on Chemical Safety. (2011).   http://www.inchem.org/documents/jecfa/jecmono/v63je01.pdf
  • ▲18.  France. Institut national de recherche et de sécurité, Fiche toxicologique no 55 : Mercure et composés minéraux. Cahiers de notes documentaires. Paris : INRS. (1997). [RE-005509]   http://www.inrs.fr/publications/bdd/fichetox.html
    http://www.inrs.fr/publications/bdd/fichetox/fiche.html?refINRS=FICHETOX_55
  • ▲19.  Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry, Toxicological profile for mercury. Atlanta [GA] : ATSDR. (1999).   http://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/ http://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/ToxProfiles/tp46.pdf
  • ▲20.  Crepy M.N, « Fiche d'allergologie-dermatologie professionnelle TA 90. Dermatose professionnelles allergiques aux métaux. Quatrième partie: allergie de contact aux autres métaux..» Document pour le médecin du travail . , p. 2-21. (2011).   http://www.rst-sante-travail.fr/rst/pages-article/ArticleRST.html?ref=RST.TA%2090
  • ▲21.  American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists, Documentation of the threshold limit values and biological exposure indices / Documentation of TLV's and BEI's. 7th ed. Cincinnati, Ohio : ACGIH. (2001-). Publication #0100Doc. [RM-514008]   http://www.acgih.org
  • ▲22.  Atkinson, A. et al., «Assessment of a two-generation reproductive and fertility study of mercuric chloride in rats.» Food and Chemical Toxicology. Vol. 39, no. 1, p. 73-84. (2001).
  • ▲23.  Heath J.C. et al., «The Effects of Chronic Ingestion of Mercuric Chloride on Fertility and Testosterone Levels in Male Sprague Dawley Rats.» Journal of Biomedecine and Biotechnology. Vol. 2012, p. 1-9. (2012).   http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3398687/pdf/JBB2012-815186.pdf
  • ▲24.  Heath J.C. et al., «The Effects of Chronic Mercuric Chloride Ingestion in Female Sprague-dawley Rats on Fertility and Reproduction.» Food and Chemical Toxicology. Vol. 47, p. 1600-1605. (2009).
  • ▲25.  Zhang Y., Bolivar V.J. et Lawrence D.A., «Developmental Exposure to Mercury Chloride Does not Impair Social Behavior of C57BL/6 x BTBR F(1) Mice..» Jounal of Immunotoxicology. Vol. 9, no. 4, p. 401-10. (2012).
  • ▲26.  Chehimi L. et al., «Chromic Exposure to Mercuric Chloride During Gestation Affects Sensitomotor Development and Later Behavior in Rats..» Behavioural Brain Research. Vol. 234, no. 1, p. 43-50. (2012).
  • ▲27.  Huang C.F. et al., «Neurotoxicological Effects of Low Dose Methylmercury and Mercuric Chloride in Developing Offspring Mice..» Toxicology Letters. Vol. 201, no. 3, p. 196-204. (2011).
  • ▲28.  Silva I.A. et al., «Prenatal HgCl2 Exposure in BALB/c Mice: Gender-Specific Effects on the Ontogeny of the Immune System..» Developmental and Comparative Immunology. Vol. 29, no. 2, p. 171-183. (2005).
  • ▲29.  Zhang Y., Bolivar V.J. et Lawrence D.A., «Meternal Exposure to Mercury Chloride During Pregnancy and Lactation Affects the Immunity and Social Behavior of Offspring.» Toxicological Sciences. Vol. 133, no. 1, p. 101-111. (2013).   http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3693512/pdf/kft023.pdf
  • ▲30.  Lauwerys, R. et al., Toxicologie industrielle et intoxications professionnelles. 5ème éd. Issy-les-Moulineaux Cedex : Elsevier Masson SAS. (2007). [RM-514015]
  • ▲31.  International Program on Chemical Safety, Elemental Mercury and Inorganic Mercury Compounds: Human Health Aspects. Concise International Chemical Assessment. Genève : World Health Organization. (2003). CICAD 50.   http://www.inchem.org/documents/cicads/cicads/cicad50.htm
  • ▲32.  Canada. Ministère des transports, Règlement sur le transport des marchandises dangereuses. Ottawa : Éditions du gouvernement du Canada. (2014). [RJ-410222]   http://www.tc.gc.ca/fra/tmd/clair-menu-497.htm
    http://www.tc.gc.ca/tmd/menu.htm

La cote entre [ ] provient de la banque Information SST du Centre de documentation de la CNESST.