L'information disponible sur cette substance est partielle. Pour de plus amples renseignements, veuillez communiquer avec le Répertoire toxicologique.

Identification

Description


Formule moléculaire brute : C10H14O4

Principaux synonymes

Noms français :

  • 1,2-BIS(METHACRYLOYLOXY) ETHANE
  • 1,2-BIS(METHACRYLOYLOXY)ETHANE
  • 2-PROPENOIC ACID, 2-METHYL, 1,2-ETHANEDIYL ESTER
  • 2-PROPENOIC ACID, 2-METHYL-, 1,2-ETHANEDIYL ESTER
  • Diméthacrylate d'éthylène glycol
  • ETHANEDIOL DIMETHACRYLATE
  • ETHYLDIOL METACRYLATE
  • ETHYLENE DIMETHACRYLATE
  • ETHYLENE GLYCOL BIS(METHACRYLATE)
  • Ethylene glycol dimethacrylate
  • ETHYLENE METHACRYLATE
  • ETHYLENEGLYCOL DIMETHACRYLATE
  • METHACRYLIC ACID, ETHYLENE ESTER
Utilisation et sources d'émission

Solvant de vernis, solvant de résines

Références

  • ▲1.  Lide, D.R., Handbook of Chemistry and Physics on CD-ROM. Version 2002. Boca Raton (FL) : Chapman & Hall / CRC Press. (2002).   www.crcpress.com
  • ▲2.  Commission des communautés européennes. Direction générale emploi, relations industrielles et affaires sociales, Fiches chimiques internationales de sécurité. Luxembourg : Office des publications officielles des Communautés européennes. (1992). [RM-515082]
  • ▲3.  Kanerva, L. et al., «Occupational pharyngitis associated with allergic patch test reactions from acrylics.» Allergy. Vol. 47, no. 5, p. 571-573. (1992). [AP-044394]
  • ▲4.  Clemmensen, S., «Cross-reaction patterns in guinea pigs sensitized to acrylic monomers.» Drug and Chemical Toxicology. Vol. 7, no. 6, p. 527-540. (1984).
  • ▲5.  Kanerva, L. et al., «Occupational allergic contact dermatitis and composition of acrylates in dentin bonding systems.» Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology & Venereology. Vol. 3, p. 157-168. (1994). [AP-058259]
  • ▲6.  Kanerva, L. et al., «Occupational allergic contact dermatitis caused by exposure to acrylates during work with dental protheses.» Contact Dermatitis. Vol. 28, no. 5, p. 268-275. (1993). [AP-043022]
  • ▲7.  Condé-Salazar, L., Guimaraens, D. et Romero, L.V., «Occupational allergic contact dermatitis from anaerobic acrylic sealants.» Contact Dermatitis. Vol. 18, p. 129-132. (1988). [AP-017817]
  • ▲8.  Tucker, S.C. et Beck, M.H., «A 15-year study of patch testing to (meth)acrylates.» Contact Dermatitis. Vol. 40, p. 278-279. (1999). [AP-060991]
  • ▲9.  Kanerva, L., Jolanki, R. et Estlander, T., «10 years of patch testing with the (meth)acrylate series.» Contact Dermatitis. Vol. 37, p. 255-268. (1997). [AP-68198]
  • ▲10.  Kanerva, L. et al., «Occupational allergic contact dermatitis from 2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate and ethylene glycol dimethacrylate in a modified acrylic structural adhesive.» Contact Dermatitis. Vol. 33, no. 2, p. 84-89. (1995).
  • ▲11.  Hemmer, W. et al., «Allergic contact dermatitis to artificial fingernails prepared from UV light-cured acrylates.» Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology. Vol. 35, p. 377-380. (1996). [AP-058258]
  • ▲12.  Geukens, S. et Goosens, A., «Occupational contact allergy to (meth)acrylates.» Contact Dermatitis. Vol. 44, no. 3, p. 153-159. (2001).
  • ▲13.  Isaksson, M. et al., «The development and course of patch-test reactions to 2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate and ethyleneglycol dimethacrylate.» Contact Dermatitis. Vol. 53, no. 5, p. 292-297. (2005).
  • ▲14.  Kanerva, L. et al., «Occupational allergic contact dermatitis caused by 2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate (2-HEMA) in a new dentin adhesive.» American Journal of Contact Dermatitis. Vol. 2, no. 1, p. 24-30. (1991). [AP-058255]
  • ▲15.  Van der Walle, H.B., Waegemaekers, T et Bensink, T., «Sensitizing potential of 12 di(meth)acrylates in the guinea pig.» Contact Dermatitis. Vol. 9, no. 1, p. 10-20. (1983). [AP-023325]
  • ▲16.  Perale, L. et al., «Methacrylates allergy in a professional beautician.» Contact Dermatitis. Vol. 53, no. 3, p. 181. (2005).
  • ▲17.  Björkner, B., «The sensitizing capacity of multifunctional acrylates in the guinea pig.» Contact dermatits. Vol. 11, p. 236-246. (1984). [AP-020305]
  • ▲18.  Tosti, A. et al., «Occupational airborne contact dermatitis due to ethylene glycol dimethacrylate.» Contact Dermatitis. Vol. 24, p. 152-153. (1991). [AP-033607]
  • ▲19.  Rustemeyer, T. et al., «Cross-reactivity patterns of contact-sensitizing methacrylates.» Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology. Vol. 148, p. 83-90. (1998).
  • ▲20.  Cavelier, C. et al., «Irritation et allergie aux acrylates et méthacrylates. Partie II : monomères acryliques polyfonctionnels.» Annales de dermatologie et de vénéréologie. Vol. 108, no. 6-7, p. 559-566. (1981).
  • ▲21.  Règlement sur la santé et la sécurité du travail [S-2.1, r. 13]. Québec : Éditeur officiel du Québec. [RJ-510071]   http://legisquebec.gouv.qc.ca/fr/ShowDoc/cr/S-2.1,%20r.%2013
  • ▲22.  BIBRA, Ethylene glycol dimethacrylate. Toxicity profile. Surrey, G B . (1996).   http://www.bibra.co.uk/

La cote entre [ ] provient de la banque Information SST du Centre de documentation de la CNESST.