CAS Number : 1565-94-2

The information for this substance is partially available.

The section entitled Complete data sheet is not available in English for this substance. Consult the French version.

Identification

Description


Formule moléculaire brute : C29H36O8

Principaux synonymes

Noms français :

  • BISPHENOL A GLYCIDYLMETHACRYLATE
  • BISPHENOL A-GLYCIDYL METHACRYLATE
  • Méthacrylate de glycidyle et de bisphénol A

Noms anglais :

  • 2-PROPENOIC ACID, 2-METHYL-, (1-METHYLETHYLIDENE)BIS(4,1-PHENYLENEOXY(2-HYDROXY-3,1-PROPANEDIYL)) ESTER
  • BISPHENOL A DIGLYCIDYL METHACRYLATE
  • Isopropylidenediphenyl bisglycidyl methacrylate

Références

  • ▲1.  Kanerva, L., Estlander, T. et Jolanki, R., «Allergic contact dermatitis from dental composite resins due to aromatic epoxy acrylates and aliphatic acrylates.» Contact Dermatitis. Vol. 20, p. 201-211. (1989). [AP-025371]
  • ▲2.  Kanerva, L., Estlander, T. et Jolanki, R., «Occupational skin allergy in the dental profession.» Dermatologic Clinics. Vol. 12, no. 3, p. 517-532. (1994). [AP-061278]
  • ▲3.  Jolanki, R. et al., «Occupational dermatoses from exposure to epoxy resin compounds in a ski factory.» Contact Dermatitis. Vol. 34, no. 6, p. 390-396. (1996). [AP-061950]
  • ▲4.  Kanerva, L. et al., «Occupational allergic contact dermatitis and composition of acrylates in dentin bonding systems.» Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology & Venereology. Vol. 3, p. 157-168. (1994). [AP-058259]
  • ▲5.  Tucker, S.C. et Beck, M.H., «A 15-year study of patch testing to (meth)acrylates.» Contact Dermatitis. Vol. 40, p. 278-279. (1999). [AP-060991]
  • ▲6.  Hemmer, W. et al., «Allergic contact dermatitis to artificial fingernails prepared from UV light-cured acrylates.» Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology. Vol. 35, p. 377-380. (1996). [AP-058258]
  • ▲7.  Geukens, S. et Goosens, A., «Occupational contact allergy to (meth)acrylates.» Contact Dermatitis. Vol. 44, no. 3, p. 153-159. (2001).
  • ▲8.  Kanerva, L. et Zwanenburg, R., «Allergic contact reactions to poly(oxy-1,2-ethanediyl) a,a'-[(1-methylethylidene)di-4, 1-phenylene]bis[omega-[(2-methyl-1-oxo-2-propenyl)oxy] (BIS-EMA).» Contact Dermatitis. Vol. 43, no. 2, p. 115-117. (2000).
  • ▲9.  Kanerva, L., Jolanki, R. et Estlander, T., «Occupational dermatitis due to an epoxy acrylate.» Contact Dermatitis. Vol. 14, p. 80-84. (1986). [AP-013827]
  • ▲10.  Bong, J.L. et English, J.S.C., «Allergic contact dermatitis from airborne exposure to acrylates.» Contact Dermatitis. Vol. 43, no. 4, p. 242. (2000).
  • ▲11.  Carmichael, A.J., Gibson, J.J. et Walls, A.W., «Allergic contact dermatitis to bisphenol-A-glycidyldimethacrylate (BIS-GMA) dental resin associated with sensitivity to epoxy resin.» British Dental Journal. Vol. 183, no. 8, p. 297-298. (1997).
  • ▲12.  Rathinam, K. et Mohanan, P.V., «Skin sensitization study of a new BIS-GMA based dental restorative material.» Biomaterials, Artificial Cells, Immobilization Biotechnology. Vol. 21, no. 1, p. 91-96. (1993).
  • ▲13.  Schröder, C., Uter, W. et Schwanitz, H., «Occupational allergic contact dermatitis, partly airborne, due to isocyanates and epoxy resin.» Contact Dermatitis. Vol. 41, no. 2, p. 117-118. (1999).
  • ▲14.  Santosh, V. et al., «Results of patch testing with dental materials.» Contact Dermatitis. Vol. 40, no. 1, p. 50-51. (1999).
  • ▲15.  Goossens, A. et al., «Occupational dermatitis in a silk-screen maker.» Contact Dermatitis. Vol. 39, no. 1, p. 40-42. (1998).
  • ▲16.  Heil, J. et al., «Genotoxicity of dental materials.» Mutation Research. Vol. 368, p. 181-194. (1996). [AP-049928]

La cote entre [ ] provient de la banque Information SST du Centre de documentation de la CNESST.