CAS Number : 109-16-0

The information for this substance is partially available.

The section entitled Complete data sheet is not available in English for this substance. Consult the French version.

Identification

Description


Formule moléculaire brute : C14H22O6

Principaux synonymes

Noms français :

  • Diméthacrylate de triéthylèneglycol

Noms anglais :

  • 2-PROPENOIC ACID, 2-METHYL-, 1,2-ETHANEDIYLBIS(OXY-2,1-ETHANEDIYL) ESTER
  • METHACRYLIC ACID, DIESTER WITH TRIETHYLENE GLYCOL
  • Triethylene glycol dimethacrylate

Références

  • ▲1.  Lide, D.R., CRC handbook of chemistry and physics. 75th ed. Boca Raton, Fla. : CRC Press. (1994).
  • ▲2.  Specialized Information Services, ChemIDplus. Bethesda, MD : National Library of Medicine. (1994-).   http://chem.sis.nlm.nih.gov/chemidplus/
  • ▲3.  Kirk-Othmer encyclopedia of chemical technology. 4th ed. New York : John Wiley & Sons. (1991-1998). [RT-423004]
  • ▲4.  Kanerva, L., Estlander, T. et Jolanki, R., «Occupational skin allergy in the dental profession.» Dermatologic Clinics. Vol. 12, no. 3, p. 517-532. (1994). [AP-061278]
  • ▲5.  Kanerva, L. et al., «Occupational allergic contact dermatitis and composition of acrylates in dentin bonding systems.» Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology & Venereology. Vol. 3, p. 157-168. (1994). [AP-058259]
  • ▲6.  Tucker, S.C. et Beck, M.H., «A 15-year study of patch testing to (meth)acrylates.» Contact Dermatitis. Vol. 40, p. 278-279. (1999). [AP-060991]
  • ▲7.  Riva, F. et al., «Sensitization to dental acrylic compounds.» Contact Dermatitis. Vol. 10, p. 245. (1984).
  • ▲8.  CIR Expert Panel, «Final report of the safety assessment of methacrylate ester monomers used in nail enhancement products.» International Journal of Toxicology. Vol. 24, no. 5, p. 53-100. (2005).
  • ▲9.  Kanerva, L., Estlander, T. et Jolanki, R., «False negative patch test reaction caused by testing with dental composite acrylic resin.» International Journal of Dermatology. Vol. 35, no. 3, p. 189-192. (1996).
  • ▲10.  Geukens, S. et Goosens, A., «Occupational contact allergy to (meth)acrylates.» Contact Dermatitis. Vol. 44, no. 3, p. 153-159. (2001).
  • ▲11.  Kanerva, L. et al., «Occupational allergic contact dermatitis caused by 2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate (2-HEMA) in a new dentin adhesive.» American Journal of Contact Dermatitis. Vol. 2, no. 1, p. 24-30. (1991). [AP-058255]
  • ▲12.  Bong, J.L. et English, J.S.C., «Allergic contact dermatitis from airborne exposure to acrylates.» Contact Dermatitis. Vol. 43, no. 4, p. 242. (2000).
  • ▲13.  Perale, L. et al., «Methacrylates allergy in a professional beautician.» Contact Dermatitis. Vol. 53, no. 3, p. 181. (2005).
  • ▲14.  Cavelier, C. et al., «Irritation et allergie aux acrylates et méthacrylates. Partie II : monomères acryliques polyfonctionnels.» Annales de dermatologie et de vénéréologie. Vol. 108, no. 6-7, p. 559-566. (1981).
  • ▲15.  Clemmensen, S., «Cross-reaction patterns in guinea pigs sensitized to acrylic monomers.» Drug and Chemical Toxicology. Vol. 7, no. 6, p. 527-540. (1984).
  • ▲16.  Fowler, E.H. et al., Triethylene Glycol Dimethacrylate (TREGDMA): Carcinogenesis Skin Painting Study in MC3H/HeNHsd Male Mice. Washington DC. (1995). Microfiche : OTS0557901, 8EHQ-0695-13474
  • ▲17.  Schweikl, H. et Schmalz, G., «Triethylene glycol dimethacrylate induces large deletions in the hprt gene of V79 cells.» Mutation Research. Vol. 438, no. 1, p. 71-78. (1999).
  • ▲18.  Schweikl, H., Schmalz, G. et Rackebrandt, K., «The mutagenic activity of unpolymerized resin monomers in Salmonella typhimurium and V79 cells.» Mutation Research. Vol. 415, p. 119-130. (1998).

La cote entre [ ] provient de la banque Information SST du Centre de documentation de la CNESST.