CAS Number : 97-90-5

The information for this substance is partially available.

The section entitled Complete data sheet is not available in English for this substance. Consult the French version.

Identification

Description


Formule moléculaire brute : C10H14O4

Principaux synonymes

Noms français :

  • 1,2-BIS(METHACRYLOYLOXY) ETHANE
  • 1,2-BIS(METHACRYLOYLOXY)ETHANE
  • 2-PROPENOIC ACID, 2-METHYL, 1,2-ETHANEDIYL ESTER
  • 2-PROPENOIC ACID, 2-METHYL-, 1,2-ETHANEDIYL ESTER
  • Diméthacrylate d'éthylène glycol
  • ETHANEDIOL DIMETHACRYLATE
  • ETHYLDIOL METACRYLATE
  • ETHYLENE DIMETHACRYLATE
  • ETHYLENE GLYCOL BIS(METHACRYLATE)
  • Ethylene glycol dimethacrylate
  • ETHYLENE METHACRYLATE
  • ETHYLENEGLYCOL DIMETHACRYLATE
  • METHACRYLIC ACID, ETHYLENE ESTER
Utilisation et sources d'émission

Solvant de vernis, solvant de résines

Références

  • ▲1.  Lide, D.R., Handbook of Chemistry and Physics on CD-ROM. Version 2002. Boca Raton (FL) : Chapman & Hall / CRC Press. (2002).   www.crcpress.com
  • ▲2.  Commission des communautés européennes. Direction générale emploi, relations industrielles et affaires sociales, Fiches chimiques internationales de sécurité. Luxembourg : Office des publications officielles des Communautés européennes. (1992). [RM-515082]
  • ▲3.  Kanerva, L. et al., «Occupational pharyngitis associated with allergic patch test reactions from acrylics.» Allergy. Vol. 47, no. 5, p. 571-573. (1992). [AP-044394]
  • ▲4.  Clemmensen, S., «Cross-reaction patterns in guinea pigs sensitized to acrylic monomers.» Drug and Chemical Toxicology. Vol. 7, no. 6, p. 527-540. (1984).
  • ▲5.  Kanerva, L. et al., «Occupational allergic contact dermatitis and composition of acrylates in dentin bonding systems.» Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology & Venereology. Vol. 3, p. 157-168. (1994). [AP-058259]
  • ▲6.  Kanerva, L. et al., «Occupational allergic contact dermatitis caused by exposure to acrylates during work with dental protheses.» Contact Dermatitis. Vol. 28, no. 5, p. 268-275. (1993). [AP-043022]
  • ▲7.  Condé-Salazar, L., Guimaraens, D. et Romero, L.V., «Occupational allergic contact dermatitis from anaerobic acrylic sealants.» Contact Dermatitis. Vol. 18, p. 129-132. (1988). [AP-017817]
  • ▲8.  Tucker, S.C. et Beck, M.H., «A 15-year study of patch testing to (meth)acrylates.» Contact Dermatitis. Vol. 40, p. 278-279. (1999). [AP-060991]
  • ▲9.  Kanerva, L., Jolanki, R. et Estlander, T., «10 years of patch testing with the (meth)acrylate series.» Contact Dermatitis. Vol. 37, p. 255-268. (1997). [AP-68198]
  • ▲10.  Kanerva, L. et al., «Occupational allergic contact dermatitis from 2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate and ethylene glycol dimethacrylate in a modified acrylic structural adhesive.» Contact Dermatitis. Vol. 33, no. 2, p. 84-89. (1995).
  • ▲11.  Hemmer, W. et al., «Allergic contact dermatitis to artificial fingernails prepared from UV light-cured acrylates.» Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology. Vol. 35, p. 377-380. (1996). [AP-058258]
  • ▲12.  Geukens, S. et Goosens, A., «Occupational contact allergy to (meth)acrylates.» Contact Dermatitis. Vol. 44, no. 3, p. 153-159. (2001).
  • ▲13.  Isaksson, M. et al., «The development and course of patch-test reactions to 2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate and ethyleneglycol dimethacrylate.» Contact Dermatitis. Vol. 53, no. 5, p. 292-297. (2005).
  • ▲14.  Kanerva, L. et al., «Occupational allergic contact dermatitis caused by 2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate (2-HEMA) in a new dentin adhesive.» American Journal of Contact Dermatitis. Vol. 2, no. 1, p. 24-30. (1991). [AP-058255]
  • ▲15.  Van der Walle, H.B., Waegemaekers, T et Bensink, T., «Sensitizing potential of 12 di(meth)acrylates in the guinea pig.» Contact Dermatitis. Vol. 9, no. 1, p. 10-20. (1983). [AP-023325]
  • ▲16.  Perale, L. et al., «Methacrylates allergy in a professional beautician.» Contact Dermatitis. Vol. 53, no. 3, p. 181. (2005).
  • ▲17.  Björkner, B., «The sensitizing capacity of multifunctional acrylates in the guinea pig.» Contact dermatits. Vol. 11, p. 236-246. (1984). [AP-020305]
  • ▲18.  Tosti, A. et al., «Occupational airborne contact dermatitis due to ethylene glycol dimethacrylate.» Contact Dermatitis. Vol. 24, p. 152-153. (1991). [AP-033607]
  • ▲19.  Rustemeyer, T. et al., «Cross-reactivity patterns of contact-sensitizing methacrylates.» Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology. Vol. 148, p. 83-90. (1998).
  • ▲20.  Cavelier, C. et al., «Irritation et allergie aux acrylates et méthacrylates. Partie II : monomères acryliques polyfonctionnels.» Annales de dermatologie et de vénéréologie. Vol. 108, no. 6-7, p. 559-566. (1981).
  • ▲21.  Règlement sur la santé et la sécurité du travail [S-2.1, r. 13]. Québec : Éditeur officiel du Québec. [RJ-510071]   http://legisquebec.gouv.qc.ca/fr/ShowDoc/cr/S-2.1,%20r.%2013
  • ▲22.  BIBRA, Ethylene glycol dimethacrylate. Toxicity profile. Surrey, G B . (1996).   http://www.bibra.co.uk/

La cote entre [ ] provient de la banque Information SST du Centre de documentation de la CNESST.