CAS Number : 97-54-1

The information for this substance is partially available.

The section entitled Complete data sheet is not available in English for this substance. Consult the French version.

Identification

Description


Formule moléculaire brute : C10H12O2

Principaux synonymes

Noms français :

  • Iso-Eugénol
  • Méthoxy-2 (propènyl-1)-4 phénol

Noms anglais :

  • Isoeugenol
  • Phenol, 2-methoxy-4-(1-propenyl)-

Références

  • ▲1.  O’Neil, M.J., Smith, A. et Heckelman, P.E., The Merck index : an encyclopedia of chemicals, drugs, and biologicals. 13th ed. Cambridge, MA : Cambridge Soft; Merck & CO. (2001). [RM-403001]
  • ▲2.  Hilton, I. et al., «Evaluation of the sensitizing potential of eugenol and isoeugenol in mice and guinea pigs.» Journal of Applied toxicology. Vol. 16, no. 5, p. 459-464. (1996).
  • ▲3.  Basketter, D.A. et Scholes, E.W., «Comparison of the local lymph node assay with the guinea-pig maximization test for the detection of a range of contact allergens.» Food and Chemical Toxicology. Vol. 30, no. 1, p. 65-69. (1992).
  • ▲4.  van Joost, T., Stolz, E. et Van der Hoek, J.C.S., «Simultaneous allergy to perfume ingredients.» Contact Dermatitis. Vol. 12, no. 2, p. 115-116. (1985). [AP-023927]
  • ▲5.  Maurer, T. et Hess, R., «The maximization test for skin sensitization potential : updating the standard protocol and validation of a modified protocol.» Food and Chemical Toxicology. Vol. 27, no. 12, p. 807-811. (1989). [AP-028358]
  • ▲6.  Gonçalo, S., Cabral, F. et Gonçalo, M., «Contact sensitivity to oak moss.» Contact Dermatitis. Vol. 19, p. 355-357. (1988).
  • ▲7.  Buckley, D.A. et al., «Fragrance as an occupational allergen.» Occupational Medicine. Vol. 52, no. 1, p. 13-16. (2002). [AP-062109]
  • ▲8.  Kimber, I. et al., «The murine local lymph node assay : results of an inter-laboratory trial .» Toxicology Letters. Vol. 55, no. 2, p. 203-213. (1991).
  • ▲9.  Foussereau, J., «Fiche d'allergologie-dermatologie professionnelle no. 35 : l'eczéma allergique aux parfums.» Documents pour le médecin du travail. , no. 25, p. 21-26. (1986). TA-35. [AP-013351]
  • ▲10.  de Groot, A.C. et al., «Patch tests with fragrance materials and preservatives.» Contact Dermatitis. Vol. 12, p. 87-92. (1985).
  • ▲11.  Buckley, D.A. et al., «The frequency of fragrance allergy in a patch-test population over a 17-year period.» The British Journal of Dermatology. Vol. 142, no. 2, p. 279-283. (2000).
  • ▲12.  George, J. D. et al., «Evaluation of the developmental toxicity of isoeugenol in Sprague-Dawley (CD) rats.» Toxicological Sciences. Vol. 60, no. 1, p. 112-120. (20001).
  • ▲13.  National Toxicology Program , Final report on the developmental toxicity of isoeugenol (cas no. 97-54-1) in sprague-dawley CD (trade name) rats exposed on gestation days 6-19 . (1999). Microfiche : PB2000-105138, TER-97006

La cote entre [ ] provient de la banque Information SST du Centre de documentation de la CNESST.